In China, scientists have identified the fossilized
remains of a tiny dinosaur in the stomach of a mammal. Scientists say the
animal's last meal probably is the first proof that mammals hunted small
dinosaurs some 130 million years ago.
It contradicts conventional evolutionary theory that
early mammals couldn't possibly attack and eat a dinosaur because they were
timid, chipmunk-sized creatures that scurried in the looming shadow of the giant
reptiles.
In this case, the mammal was about the size of a
large cat, and the victim was a very young "parrot dinosaur" that measured about
5 inches long.
A second mammal fossil found at the same site claims
the distinction of being the largest early mammal ever found. It's about the
size of a modern dog, a breathtaking 20 times larger than most mammals living in
the early Cretaceous Period.
Considering the specimens in tandem, scientists
suggest the period in which these animals lived may have been much different
than is commonly understood as the Age of Dinosaurs -- a time dominated by
long-necked, 85-ton plant-eaters and the emergence of terrifying hunters with
bladelike teeth and sickle claws.
It appears that at least some smaller dinosaurs had
to look over their shoulders for snarling, meat-eating mammals claiming the same
turf.
"This new evidence gives us a drastically new
picture," said paleontologist Meng Jin of the American Museum of Natural History
in New York City, a co-author of the study in Thursday's issue of the journal
Nature.
Other scientists who did not work on the bones
described the discoveries as "exhilarating."
"This size range really has surprised everybody,"
said Zhexi Luo of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, who digs
in the same area of northeast China. "It dispels the conventional
wisdom."
The fossils were found more than two years ago by
villagers in the rich fossil beds of Liaoning province. The specimens were taken
to a Beijing lab, where they were cleaned and analyzed by Chinese and American
scientists.
The dinosaur-eater belongs to a species called
Repenomamus robustus, known previously from skull fragments. It has no modern
relatives.
The squat, toothy specimen measures a little less
than 2 feet long, and probably weighed about 15 pounds. On R. robustus' left
side and under the ribs in the area of its stomach are the fragmented remains of
a very young Psittacosaurus.
This common, fast-moving plant-eater is known as the
"parrot dinosaur" because it had a small head with a curved, horny beak. Its
arms were much shorter than its legs. Adults grew to be 6 feet long, but the one
that was devoured was just 5 inches.
The remains still are recognizable, indicating that
R. robustus ripped its prey like a crocodile, but probably had not developed the
ability to chew food like more advanced mammals.
"It must have swallowed food in large hunks," Meng
said.
The larger, second fossil also is a Repenomamus, but
considerably larger -- more than 3 feet long with a likely weight of more than
30 pounds. Dubbed R. giganticus, it weighed 20 times more than most of the 290
known early mammals, Meng said.
A larger mammal could roam and hunt aggressively,
preying on young dinosaurs.
"Giganticus is in a league by itself," Luo said.
"It's the world champion so far for body mass in any Mesozoic
mammal."
This new class of predatory mammals has set off new
speculation.
Originally, scientists believed that mammals remained
small because larger dinosaurs were hunting them. Only after dinosaurs went
extinct by 65 million years ago did surviving mammals begin to grow larger, they
reasoned.
Now, the discovery of larger mammals is reversing
some of the speculation. The Liaoning region already is famous for its trove of
small feathered dinosaurs and early birds.
"Maybe small dinosaurs got larger -- or got off the
ground -- to avoid rapacious mammals," wonders Duke University paleontologist
Anne Weil.
Equally mysterious is how these specimens died.
Neither shows evidence of being hunted itself.
The Yixian rock formation in which their bones were
encased is a combination of river sediments and volcanic ash. The formation also
includes the fossils of insects, frogs and other creatures, suggesting a mass
die-off.
"It's possible that poisonous volcanic gas killed the
animals when they were sleeping," Meng said. "Then there was a catastrophic
explosion that buried the whole thing."